|
The Project Team, at its meeting in February, whilst having previously welcomed the growth in the stone masonry training figures for 2001/2, was surprised to be advised that there was concern at the qualification outcome figures.
Whilst these are still in general terms the figures did indicate that, although the trainee intake figures for the entire construction industry met, and in some cases exceed, the agreed targets, the number of trainees securing the SVQ3 qualification was "quite disappointing" .
As indicated this is now a matter of further research to determine why the numbers of those securing the SVQ3 qualification did not reflect the initial trainee intake.
It is hoped that this further research and subsequent analysis will be available for the next edition of this Newsletter.
Further statistics
General press comments (21st January) from construction industry "employers" indicated that some 80% were experiencing difficulties recruiting bricklayers with some 60% indicating that there was a shortage of carpenters.
But closer examination of the CITB intake figures show that only 36% of all Scottish construction industry employers actually OFFER training opportunities.
So the question to those employers who are complaining about the lack of these skills is "What are YOU going to do about it?"
|
If YOU do not have the necessary skilled staff will you turn work away or will YOU recruit those with lesser skills and hope to muddle through?
To put no finer point on it "Are you prepared to let the success and development of YOUR business be controlled by others?"
Whilst the above is serious further examination of statistics show that Scottish employers provide approximately 20% of the CITB UK intake figures, which on a UK population basis is twice that which would be anticipated.
So if the situation in Scotland is causing some concern then imagine the situation that exists south of the border where only 15% (CITB statistics) of employers provide training opportunities.
It is argued by many, and it is a sustainable argument, the growth of the Labour Only Sub-contractor is the basis of the problem. Such "single company" operatives are paid on output and therefore have no wish to be held back by training anyone.
Such a situation only breeds the "cowboy" builder who can go from job to job to be sacked only when their skill deficiency is identified. The damage that may have been done, the threat to the safety of others on theses sites only arising when accidents occur - and this is in an industry which the accident statistics collated by the HSE show dangerous it can be.
|